Now showing items 1-10 of 34
Law professor reveals shocking truth about hearsay
G. Michael Fenner, Law Professor Reveals Shocking Truth About Hearsay, 62 UMKC L. Rev. 1 (1993).
This article exposes shocking, never-before-revealed truths about hearsay evidence. In my study of the rule, leading to my book (THE HEARSAY RULE, 2d edition, published in 2009 by Carolina Academic Press) I have discovered ...
Circumstantial evidence in Nebraska
G. Michael Fenner, Circumstantial Evidence in Nebraska, 19 Creighton L. Rev. 236 (1986).
Historically there were four lines of Nebraska cases regarding the value of circumstantial evidence. They proceeded along parallel tracks, oblivious to each other. This article traces the history of the four lines and comes ...
Presumptions: 350 years of confusion and it has come to this
G. Michael Fenner, Presumptions: 350 Years of Confusion and It Has Come to This, 25 Creighton L. Rev. 383 (1992), reprinted in Evidence for the Nebraska Practitioner (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1994).
The title of this article — Presumptions: 350 Years of Confusion and It Has come to This — is pretty much self-explanatory. The article begins with “the bottom line on presumptions. They are inextricably confused devices ...
About presumptions in civil actions
G. Michael Fenner, About Presumptions in Civil Actions, 17 Creighton L. Rev. 307 (1984).
Handling the turncoat witness under the Federal Rules of Evidence
G. Michael Fenner, Commentary, Handling the Turncoat Witness Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, 55 Notre Dame Law. 536 (1980).
Daubert handbook: The case, its essential dilemma, and its progeny
G. Michael Fenner, The Daubert Handbook: The Case, Its Essential Dilemma, and Its Progeny, 29 Creighton L. Rev. 939 (1996).
This Article is about Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It is not about whether Daubert is a good decision or whether it is a bad decision, although, in my view, Daubert is a pretty good decision given the statute ...
Competency and examination of witnesses under Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Nebraska Evidence Rule
G. Michael Fenner, Competency and Examination of Witnesses Under Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Nebraska Evidence Rules, 9 Creighton L. Rev. 559 (1976).
G. Michael Fenner, The Hearsay Rule (2003).
Article VII: Opinion evidence
G. Michael Fenner, Article VII: Opinion Evidence, in Nebraska Rules of Evidence (Neb. Continuing Legal Educ. ed., 1975).
Article VI: Witnesses
G. Michael Fenner, Article VI: Witnesses, in Nebraska Rules of Evidence (Neb. Continuing Legal Educ. ed., 1975).