• Login
    View Item 
    •   CDR Home
    • School of Law
    • Creighton Law Review
    • View Item
    •   CDR Home
    • School of Law
    • Creighton Law Review
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    I Believe, The Golden Rule, Send a Message, and Other Improper Closing Arguments

    View/Open
    48CLR521.pdf (1.641Mb)
    Citation Information

    Title
    I Believe, The Golden Rule, Send a Message, and Other Improper Closing Arguments

    Authors
    Mangrum, Richard Collin

    Journal
    Creighton University Law Review

    Volume
    48

    Issue
    3

    Pages
    521-552

    Date
    2015, June
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    INTRODUCTION

    Closing argument provides counsel with an opportunity to put the entire case together for the jury in a mosaic tapestry of facts, inferences, and law. The jury has patiently endured voir dire, openings, directs, crosses, redirects, the admission of exhibits, and the tedious instructions by the judge. The jury wants, expects, hopes that counsel's closings will make their responsibilities easier by explaining how it all fits coherently together so that the jurors can confidently decide the issues presented to them without having to go through the controversy, confusion, and conflict depicted in the movie Twelve Angry Men...
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10504/72815
    Collections
    • Creighton Law Review

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of the CDRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV